53. Regulations have lagged behind the ingenuity of advertisers. For example, the banning of traditional tobacco advertising is insufficient. A study measuring brain reactions to a range of stimulants (cigarette packets, advertising posters, promotional items and brand exposure through sponsorship) show that sponsorship images, such as using a colour code for items even without explicitly mentioning the brand, stimulate areas of the brain associated with the desire to smoke. These results invite considerations of ways to regulate all forms of indirect advertising and sponsorship.
Year | 2014 |
Topic | Tobacco control |
Document Type | Special Reports |
Country | N/A |
Policy Area | Packaging and labeling Tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (TAPS) |
Human Rights | Right to health Right to information |
Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Report on cultural rights: Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, A/69/286, (2014). Pars. 53. Available at: https://undocs.org/A/69/286
2021 - Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Recommendation #25 par. 97 (2021) - 2109
https://righttohealthpolicyhub.org/database/committee-on-the-rights-of-the-child-general-recommendation-25-par-97-2021-2Food policy Tobacco control CRC Food marketing regulations Digital environment Tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship (TAPS)